How to Prepare for the Pitfalls in Employee Experience Transformation
We’ve spent the last two and half years working on how to manage EX in large scale companies and truly understand the importance of EX. In a recent study we conducted alongside the HR Congress (see FIG 1); we found that while EX is a priority for Chief HR Officers, as a HR function we don’t have a clear plan on how to execute on it.
We need to be clear on what EX is, how to scale it and improve it. We see that the road to EX impact in large, complex organisations is less about perfecting the three capabilities of the EX methodology (Design, Measurement, HR / cross-functional operational model) and more about connecting these components together effectively through an iterative methodology to manage EX at scale. If you execute on this well then it will drive business value. Without iteration EX could be just another isolated “HR initiative”, precisely the kind that the profession is trying to move away from.
Many survey vendors can tell you what EX feels like in the words of your employees, what we’re focused on here are the pitfalls you may encounter when intentionally creating that feeling at scale.
Based on several years’ experience we wanted to share some pitfalls that we’ve seen unstick the best of intentions in EX. Last month we had the privilege of hosting 20 HR leaders from across the United States at Dolby’s office in San Francisco. Our goal was to guide the group through the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of sustainable EX improvement and co-create solutions to the pitfalls we’ve identified to address them:
1. Lack of leadership buy in to your EX project
Defined problem: We can’t see how to connect EX to business value; business leadership are not convinced that improvement in experience will lead to productivity improvement and reduced HR costs (see Fig 2 for business value model). We lack the data to support our case for investment upfront and are unsure who to approach for sponsorship.
Solutions: caveat here, this depends on your role and reach in HR but we made the assumption that “we” are leading Employee Experience.
Start small with your initial journey/touchpoint improvement- don’t boil the ocean with declarations of improving all EX- this will only disappoint because expectations will be too high from leadership and employees. Rather, look for an opportunity, a business leader feeling some talent “pain” and see how taking a customer first, outside-in view of the problem could help. This is your path of least resistance with maximum impact and it will gain momentum and interest from other business leaders when the changes are measured and demonstrate an improved experience.
Start small with your financial investment- Again, if you go big in terms of what you want to tackle, you’ll require more business sponsorship and potential budget. It will also require the initiative to have a clearer link to business value data which could be challenging at the very start.
In summary, find individuals in your business organisation that would be open to championing this (start small) approach, then when you prove that EX can be measured, improved and iterated on then you will have momentum to expand other across employee journeys and business areas.
2. Business buy in but unsure how to prioritise
Defined problem: You’re excited, YES- you have support to move forward with an EX project! BUT you will need to demonstrate results. How do we align resources, what are the HR priorities? How do we define the roadmap of journeys to tackle and the HR infrastructure required? What success measures do we use?
Review the HR strategy and subsequently the most critical employee journeys (Fig 3)
Identify from those journeys which ones are high impact and low complexity, see example in Fig 4. This will feed into your road map of journeys to work on in the future.
Per the previous section prepare a business case for the responsible leader of that journey to also solidify sponsorship and start small.
Define success, what do we want to change and impact before heading into the project…more to come on measurement.
3. Stalled Design thinking which fails to scale
a) HR teams are being rightly ambitious in applying design thinking principles to EX. Looking back at Graphic 3, some employee journeys have ~50 touch points so if you aim to address the full journey at once you’re setting expectations too high.
b) In addition, there can be a lack of understanding as to how to operationalise prototypes coming out of design thinking because it requires collaboration between cross-functional siloed teams with competing priorities. The way to drive this change in operating model is to measure the impact of these prototypes).
Prioritise the critical touch points, which may be either effortless moments or ‘moments of truth’ that are broken and select those that will have the most impact on the experience for your design thinking workshop. Be intentional about how you want them to feel (Fig 5).
Set expectations with your cross functional teams because remember almost half of touch points are NOT owned by HR. This means it is even more important to set realistic expectations around what you can change and at what pace. Remember the idea of design thinking and TI People’s EX methodology is to iteratively improve, you will not get to the perfect solution from the outset. But, if you have measurement data, you’re also able to hold your partner teams accountable to improvement.
4. Journey design and measurement are disconnected
Defined problem: Design thinking, as discussed, is a key part of improving experiences for your employees. We can learn from customer-facing teams’ approach to CX measurement which is to understand satisfaction at specific touch points. That data is then used to iterate on the design of the experience, you know what is working and what is not.
Back to HR; very often, impact from ambitious EX projects and design thinking workshops is lost because the improvement is not seen, it’s not measured. Therefore, it is impossible to know if the prototypes you worked hard to build have had a positive impact on experience.
Map current state journey with the moments of truth clearly defined, base this on persona (key talent segment) feedback
Deploy direct measurement at critical touch points which use just ONE customer satisfaction question with room for additional feedback from your employees (Graphic 6). This enables timely resolution and tracking of improvements in real time.
Deploy passive listening at key moments to compliment direct surveys. At TI People we are currently co-creating a solution to passively listen to touch point experience via existing internal company and external data sources.
Communicate the quick wins you are implementing with your employees and how you will continue to iterate based on their feedback.
We have just scratched the surface here and if you see yourself in these scenarios, then you are not alone! If you’d like to discuss how to move your organisation forward or share any feedback, please get in touch.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Carly Fordham is a Managing Director with TI People for North America. Carly holds degrees in business and psychology, and has worked for U.S. and UK consulting companies with much of her career at CEB, part of Gartner. At CEB, Carly held senior management positions across both the HR and Customer Practice areas in APAC and Europe.
PRESS PLAY ON YOUR CAREER: JOIN OUR ONLINE ACADEMY
Invest in your career and learn the HR skills of the future. The myHRfuture Academy provides you with an on-demand platform where you can get access to short, bitesized learning content to help you build knowledge in the skills that you need to prepare for the future of HR. Get access to exclusive content on People Analytics, Digital HR & HR Technology, Design Thinking, Workforce Planning, Consulting & Influencing and Stakeholder Management.